Skip to main content
Cart

Hilti HDA undercut anchor helping to achieve higher performing design with more peace of mind

Hilti Engineering Centre
Reading time: < 10 minutes
Article

Enhanced performance with the help of updated ETA!

1. What is Hilti HDA?

pe of undercut anchor which has its unique shape and creates undercut by the anchor itself during its installation (Fig. 1.1). The anchor features an undercut sleeve, that when tightened or activated causes the anchor to create small expansion and grip the concrete tightly. The undercut holds the anchor firmly in place by creating interlocking forces between anchor and concrete.

Illustration of a torque-controlled expansion anchor installed in concrete, showing tensile load transfer through expansion forces at the anchor tip and a photograph of the installed anchor in a drilled hole.

Fig. 1.1: Undercut of concrete created by the anchor (HDA) or installation tools

The assessment document for Hilti HDA anchors, ETA-99/0009 (2015) [1], refers to ETAG 0001 Annex C for design against static and EOTA TR 045 against seismic loading. However, EN 1992-4:2018 completely replaces both the standards for design of anchors under static and seismic loading conditions. The growing demand for use of Hilti HDA anchor for structural and non-structural applications and the requirement by designers in terms of code compliant technical data, higher performance in tension and shear (static and seismic), less edge distance and spacing due to geometrical limitations or target enhanced design life for industrial and infrastructures, requires an upgrade of the existing assessment documents. Accordingly, a reassessment of Hilti HDA anchor performance was carried out and the Hilti HDA anchor portfolio is relaunched along with the upgraded ETA and ICC-ESR documents. Chapter 5 discusses in detail the area of improvements as per updated ETA.

Before going in to details of the changes in updated ETA assessment, the main advantages and key application areas are discussed in the following Chapters 2 and 3. 2.

2. The main advantages of the HDA anchor

Hilti provides a complete SPEC2SITE offering for your applications suitable for HDA undercut anchors, enabling you to design better specifications.

Summary of key benefits of an undercut anchor system, including higher performance, value-engineered designs, code-compliant design support, installation guidance, and sustainability advantages.

Table 2.1: HDA SPEC2SITE offering HDA anchors are made of carbon steel, sherardised and stainless steel and available both in pre-set (P/PF/PR) and through-set (T/TF/TR) version (Table 2.2).

Product table showing HDA anchor variants in carbon steel, sheradised steel and stainless steel, including pre-set and through-set installation types with corresponding product images.

Table 2.2: HDA anchor portfolio

For more details regarding products and installation steps refer to the IFU documents which can be found on the product pages under operating instructions and are also linked below: HDA-P HDA-T

3. Key applications for the HDA anchor

Hilti HDA anchor is suitable for a variety of demanding structural and non-structural applications including nuclear power plants under static and dynamic loading (shock, seismic, fatigue) in cracked and uncracked concrete. Some of the key applications are as follows (Fig. 3.1):

Four example applications for mechanical anchors: structural baseplates, mechanical and electrical supports, tunnel fastening, and industrial fastening installations.

Fig. 3.1: Different applications for HDA anchor

4. What are the key assessments available for the HDA anchor?

HDA anchor has most of the relevant approvals for use in cracked / uncracked concrete under static and dynamic loadings (see Table 4.1) including the use in nuclear power plants under NQA-1 nuclear quality assurance program.

European Approvals

Approval no

Application / loading

ETA-99/0009

Static, quasi-static, Seismic

ETA-18/0974

Fatigue

BZS D 09-601

Shockproof fastenings in civil defense installations

Z-21.1-1987

German national approval for use in nuclear power plants

Table 4.1: EU approvals for HDA

5. ETA enhancements

5.1 Concrete cone k1 factor

The old ETA-99/0009 (2015) [1] did not mention the concrete cone resistance factor 𝑘1 for cylinder strength of concrete (𝑓𝑐𝑘,𝑐𝑦𝑙) and considered cube strength of concrete 𝑓𝑐𝑘,𝑐𝑢𝑏𝑒), which is not in line with the current design standard (EN 1992-4 [2]). ETA-99/0009 (2025) [3] defines higher values of 𝑘1 as 12.7 for uncracked and 8.9 for cracked concrete (i.e., same as for cast-in headed studs) for 𝑓𝑐𝑘,𝑐𝑦𝑙 assessed following the state-of-the-art EOTA requirements.

5.2 Improved pull-out resistance

The pull-out resistance values in updated ETA [3] are mentioned same as steel resistance values (𝑁𝑅𝑘,𝑠 ) for uncracked concrete and same as concrete cone resistance (𝑁𝑅𝑘,𝑐 0 ) for cracked concrete , because they are not decisive in design. In the old ETA [1] the pull-out resistance values were smaller than the cone resistance.

5.3 Minimum edge distance and spacing

After more detailed testing and assessment, minimum edge distance and spacing required for installation of anchors have been reduced up to the allowable limit in updated ETA-99/0009 [3] (Fig. 5.1). The reduction in edge distance and spacing helps using HDA anchors in thinner elements.

Bar chart comparing minimum edge and spacing distances under ETA 2015 and ETA 2025. The updated ETA reduces required distances by up to 25% for edge distance and up to 40% for spacing, improving installation flexibility.

Fig. 5.1: Change in minimum edge distance and spacing values

5.4 Improved shear performance and use of filling set

In old ETA [1] the provision of using Hilti filling set with anchors was not included. In the updated ETA [3], the shear performance has been improved 1) by retesting without filling set 2) by using filling set for both static and seismic condition.

By retesting HDA anchors the shear performance gets increased considerably up to 26% and 41% under static loading without and with Hilti filling set, respectively. Similar increases in performance have been achieved for the seismic shear resistances as well. Updated ETA [3] provides the value of steel resistance in shear for both the options, with and without filling set. Steel resistances under static shear loading for HDA P anchor according to old ETA [1] and updated ETA [3] with and without using filling set is exemplary shown in Fig. 5.2.

Two bar charts compare static shear resistance under ETA 2015 and ETA 2025. Updated ETA values are higher for all anchor sizes and materials, with increases of 9–41%, and the largest gains occurring when a filling set is used.

Fig. 5.2: Steel resistance under static shear loading for HDA-P

5.5 Effective length consideration for concrete edge break-out failure under shear loading

In the old ETA [1], the values of effective length 𝑙𝑓 used in the calculation of resistance against concrete edge break-out failure were lesser than the value of effective embedment depth ℎ𝑒𝑓 for each diameter of anchor. The updated ETA [3] considers the 𝑙𝑓 same as ℎ𝑒𝑓 as per EN 1992-4, cl. No. 7.2.2.5 (6) for post-installed HDA anchors. Table 5.1 shows the effective length values considered for concrete edge break-out resistance.

Table of anchor diameter versus lf length. Updated ETA values exceed Old ETA values for all sizes: M10 100 vs 70 mm, M12 125 vs 88 mm, M16 190 vs 90 mm, and M20 250 vs 120 mm.

Table 5.1: Effective length values in old and updated As per updated ETA [3], there can be an increase in concrete edge resistance with the increase in 𝑙𝑓 value up to 12%. A sample graph for the change in characteristic concrete edge resistance for single anchor is shown in Fig. 5.3.

Line chart comparing concrete edge resistance and anchor diameter. Resistance rises with diameter for both methods. Updated ETA (red) is higher than Old ETA (grey) at all sizes, reaching 95.87 kN versus 85.37 kN at 20 mm.

Fig. 5.3: Concrete edge break-out characteristic resistance for static loading (C20/25 grade concrete with edge distance of 1.5ℎ𝑒𝑓)

5.6 Removal of Centering washer

Centering washer is not part of the updated ETA [3] and all resistance values against shear loading for HDA-T/TR anchor are provided without the same.

5.7 Extended design life of 100 years

The design life is extended to 100 years in updated ETA [3] and resistance data for tension and shear are provided for both 50 and 100 years.

5.8 Fire resistance data in ETA

Fire resistance data for fire ratings of 30, 60, 90 and 120 mins against tension and shear loading are included in updated ETA [3]. This will help in the use of HDA anchors in case of fire exposure as well.

6. Conclusion

In conclusion, the updated ETA with improvements in performance and requirement of minimum edge distance and spacing will help HDA anchor to be used in more safety critical applications.

Please visit HOL page for more details on anchors

To start designing, visit https://profisengineering.hilti.com/.

7. References

[1] ETA-99/0009: Hilti HDA and HDA-R, Marne-la-Vallée: CSTB, 06.01.2015.

[2] EN 1992-4:2018: Eurocode 2 - Design of concrete structures - Part 4: Design of fastenings for use in concrete, Brussels: CEN, 2018.

[3] ETA-99/0009: Hilti HDA-P, HDA-PR, HDA-T, HDA-TR, Marne-la-Vallée: CSTB, 06.05.2025.

[4] EOTA EAD 330232-01-0601: Mechanical fasteners for use in concrete, Brussels: EOTA, 2021.

[5] S2C Handbook: Steel to concrete connections using Post-installed systems, Schaan: Hilti Corporation, 2024.

[6] EOTA TR 045: Design of Metal Anchors For Use In Concrete Under Seismic Actions, Brussels: EOTA, 2013.